April 7, 2009

Advice from Jon Hammond

I have spoken to several people about my experiences interviewing for fellowship positions this year, and during the interviewing process I made several pages of notes that I wanted to share to hopefully help the next group of student in the interviewing process. I thought some of this information might be useful for those interviewing for internships as this time as well.  There are a lot of things that I could have done better, and I learned a lot about interviewing during the process, and so I wanted to pass some of that information on.  Others may have had similar or even different experiences, so by no means are all the questions or answers going to be obtained from my experiences, but I hope they may help someone in the future. 

Before I began my application process, I focused on 15 fellowships’ that I wanted to apply to.  I figured if I applied to 15 places, that I would get phone interviews at half of those, and then hopefully have on site interviews at 3-4 places.  I was able to phone interview at 7-8 different places, but I was only extended one on site invitation; fortunately I had a good on-site visit which ultimately resulted in an offer.  After several places did not offer me an on-site interview I was able to f/u by either phone or email and ask some additional questions about my interview and some of the things they may have been looking for, and things I could have done better.  I was given some very good and candid feedback, and everyone was very glad to help me with my questions.  Some of the feedback that I received via email included the following:

“The bottom line is that we had a very competitive group of applicants and the interview team had to rate all candidates based on overall performance around areas like work experience, confidence/demeanor when communicating, portrayed level of commitment to the area for the longer-term, fellowship vs. job inclination and interest in/knowledge about (Organization here). Quite a few candidates ranked very closely together so our prioritization was driven by how each of you stacked against each other.”

Another said: “If there was one thing I would recommend to you in your future interviews it would be to show greater enthusiasm for what you are talking about.  In the fellowship selection process we are not necessarily looking for the candidate with the most experience.  Instead we are looking for people who offer great potential and a passion for the work.  I have no doubt that you have both of these characteristics. Unfortunately, you failed to convey your passion over the phone.”

Another provided this feedback: “All told, I think you gave a strong interview, especially when we engaged in an active dialog.  So, even though I will highlight some potential areas for improvement, these are generally minor. On the monologs, your answers were still good, but not quite as strong.  I think that you used the word concise in one of your previous emails, and I think that's a fair word to use.  You may want to trim the tangential details down just a bit, and focus on your actions/behavior. A couple direct sentences describing the situation that you're in is often sufficient, but if you're spending much more than about 30 seconds on the situation and haven't started talking about what you did/thought/approached/etc., you're probably going too in depth there.

In describing what you did/your actions, you should have a general understanding of what you want to convey to me.  To say it another way, why does the story that you're telling me show that you're a strong candidate?  Your response to the question of 'tell me about a time that you had to incorporate the input from many different stakeholders' may be a good illustration of this.  Your example was good one - you worked with many different departments to create and develop a product.  But, I don't know if you showed initiative involving others.  Or showed leadership incorporating and resolving conflicting expectations.  Or showed communication skills convincing a single party of a necessary outcome.  Or showed project management skills juggling a dozen different obligations.  Or show problem solving skills walking through a single complex issue that arose.  So, you answered the question - which is great - but you kind of missed an opportunity to show how great you are :)

My hunch is that you didn't get a chance to prepare as well as you'd have liked (which is understandable - I know how hectic your schedule is).  I say this because your most concise (and probably strongest) response was to my most obvious question 'tell me about a time that you had to show leadership.'  However, questions that were still standard but less slightly common didn't elicit quite as concise of a response.  For an interview like this, you should probably have a general idea of what example (around 3 minutes or so in length) you will use to a couple dozen different questions (leadership, communication, presentation, conflict resolution, ethics, teamwork, project management, managing multiple obligations, organization, etc.).  Like I said, all of these are minor, and me highlighting them here is really me being nit-picky.

The first thing that I realized is that this is a very competitive process, and getting discouraged doesn’t help.  You are competing with MHA or MBA grads from other programs all over the country, and there are a lot of good qualified people interviewing.  I also believe that it helps to be a little lucky.  Sometimes you get a person on the phone that you can more easily connect with, and sometimes you get someone that seems like they are just going through the motions.  I would definitely recommend some mock telephone, and/or mock in person interviews, as this is the best way to get feedback about how you could improve your interviewing skills over the phone.  If you sound enthusiastic and professional on the phone, then you will perform well on the telephone interviews.

I also listed about 18 different questions that I was asked during my interview process.  Many of these are pretty common questions, and there are certainly many others that could be asked, but knowing immediately how you would answer this list of questions will help start a foundation for good phone and face-to-face interviewing.

  1. Tell us about yourself.
  2. What attracted you to the position at (organization here)?
  3. What three things would you think keep a hospital CEO up at night?
  4. Do you see yourself more in an operations or a corporate role and why?
  5. Describe a time when you were faced with making an ethical decision, and what was the outcome.
  6. Describe a time when you were disappointed, and what did you do.
  7. Describe a time when you met an obstacle and how did you overcome it.
  8. What about this particular fellowship (job/internship) was attractive to you?
  9. Describe an obstacle that you had to overcome.
  10. Why do you want to pursue a fellowship over going straight into a job?
  11. What do you think the weaknesses of this particular fellowship might be? Strengths?
  12. What are the strengths and weaknesses of managers you have had in the past, and how would you describe your management style?
  13. What are your three achievements you are most proud of?
  14. What are your specific expectations of the fellowship (job) position?
  15. What are your greatest strengths? Weaknesses?
  16. Describe a time when you had prioritize your time.  What was the situation and how did you do it?
  17. Describe a time when you had to resolve a conflict between co-workers.
  18. Where do you see yourself in 5 years?  10 years?

April 6, 2009

HIMSS 2009 Conference Day I

Hello Readers!

Today was the first day of the HIMSS 2009 Conference (although they did have things yesterday, but I wasn’t here so it doesn’t count…right?)  Before things got started, however, I have a few experiences to share from Saturday.

Dr. Kochendorfer and I kicked off our Saturday morning by driving to Milwaukee (from Chicago) and meeting with the Health Informatics folks at University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee.  There we introduced from of the work we’ve accomplished at MU and then shared out thoughts about the stimulus package, our NIH Grant, and potential collaborative with UWM.  We were very encouraged by the meeting and I am happy to share more with all of you’d like.  Just comment on this post.

We then ate at a local Korean BBQ.  The UWM folks were quite impressed with my courage to eat there since I have never had Korean food before, but were also quick to comment on how foolish it might be :)

From Milwaukee, we drove straight to downtown Chicago for a meeting with Bernard Ewigman (Chair of the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Chicago).  Dr. Kochendorfer, Dr. Belden, and I spoke with Dr. Ewigman about evaluation approaches to our NIH grant proposal.  He also agreed to write a strong letter of recommendation and assist with the grant proposal as much as possible.Hutson.Kochendorfer.Ewigman.Belden EVENTS OF THE HIMSS

We attended on education session today because it seemed the most interesting.  It was titled “Value-Driven Health Care: Leveraging Data to Improve Efficiency, Productivity, Quality”.  The presentation was given by David Katz MD, JD.  You may remember him from some classroom readings.  He outlined how EMR data could improve efficiency, producitivity and quality.  EMR data would help to identify outliers, empower management and physicians to address these outliers, control them.  Once controlled, the organizations could implement measures to improve the group as a whole.  Dr. Kochendorfer and I had a few reservations about his methods, solutions, and conclusions, but I will leave that for another time if I get comments showing interest.

After the education session, I set up a meeting with Mark Anderson (CEO of AC Group).  Dr. Belden was interested in discussing out HIMSS Usability White Paper.  We got that and MORE.  It was evident that Mark was very passionate about his chosen professions and loved the chance to speak with me and two docs about his ideas, expertise, and experiences.P1000695 Ask always, leave comments and ask questions.

April 1, 2009

“Pre-Habit” Work Part II

The sequential nature of the seven habits: The maturity continuum.

Low Maturity: Dependence

Dependence basically means that you need others to get what you want.  It is the attitude of “you”.  “You take are of me”…”You come through for me or you don’t come through for me”…”I blame you for the results”.  It is very “you” oriented.  Dependence means that you are not free from external influence.

Middle Maturity: Independence

Independence means you are pretty much free from external influence.  That is, the control and support of others.  You can get what you want from your own efforts.  Independence is the attitude of “I”.  “I can do it”…”I am responsible”…”I’m self-reliant”…”I can choose”

High Maturity: Interdependence

If people were interdependent they would think in terms of “we” because it is the basic approach of needing other people to accomplish with you what you desire.  Examples, a marriage, family, or an executive team.  “I want what you want and what we want together”…”We can cooperate” “We can combine our ability, skills, and best efforts to achieve what we want”

The important caveat for the maturity continuum is that until you and I are independent, we cannot be interdependent.  We cannot work together unless we have learned to work for ourselves.

If you take some quiet reflection, where do you find yourself on the maturity continuum?  Can you think of times when you or others acted ‘dependently’?  How did it affect effectiveness with people?  What do you think it will take to shift your paradigm to a higher level of maturity? 

Are you already working interdependently?  What experiences can you share?

Thanks